This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Business Property Relief: Exploiting the Group Rules
27/07/2007, by Matthew Hutton MA, CTA (fellow), AIIT, TEP, Tax Articles - Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes
3354 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

Matthew Hutton MA, CTA (fellow), AIIT, TEP, author of Monthly Tax Review, highlights a planning point on Business Property Relief for Inheritance Tax Purposes, and some bizarre effects of the rules. 

Matthew Hutton
Matthew Hutton
Key Features

As directed by IHTA 1984, s 103(2), The meanings of ‘holding company’ and ‘subsidiary’ are found in CA 1985, s 736 (IHTA 1984, s 103(2), now in CA 2006, ss 1159 & 1160 and Sch 6).

Relief for value of shares in a holding company:
 
- not precluded by s 105(3) if its business consists in being a holding company of one or more companies to which s 105(3) does not apply (s 105(4)(b)).

- A reduction must be made if it has an investment subsidiary (or land or share dealing subsidiary), unless the business of the subsidiary consists wholly or mainly in holding land/buildings occupied by other group companies not falling with s 105(3) (s 111). 

A judicious mixture of activities within a group structure offers the prospect of achieving 100% BPR without offending:

- either s 105(3)
- or s 112 (‘excepted assets’).

Bizarre effects – Contrast three scenarios

1.  Holdco owns 49% of Xco (which has a business not prohibited by s 105(3)). 

Result: Xco is not a subsidiary of Holdco and the value of its shares counts as an ‘investment’.

2.  Holdco is a 49% partner in a business exactly similar to Xco.

Result: Holdco has a trade (or rather a share in a trade).

3.  Suppose now Holdco has the right to remove a majority of the Board of Xco with the consent of the other shareholders, but that no-one else has a similar right. 

Result: Xco is now a ‘subsidiary’ of Holdco in terms of CA 2006, s 1159(1)(b) & Schedule 6 para 3.

A further bizarre effect

The shares in Holdco are worth £1,000, apportioned (on an assets basis) as to £510 to 100% holding in S and £490 to other investments.

In turn S (worth £510) is mainly trading (say £260) but also has investments worth £250. 

Result: S satisfies s 105(3) & Holdco satisfies s 105(4)(b). Therefore, a trading arm worth £260 supports 100% BPR in respect of investments worth £740. 

Comment

The above is of course in simplified form: one must stand back and look at the whole picture ‘in the round’.  Interestingly, unlike the situation on taper relief and the substantial shareholdings exemption from CGT (where HMRC’s stance is very prescriptive), no guidance is given as to how s 105(4)(b) should be applied.

(My conference on 20 June on Inheritance Tax 2007/08: Practical Solutions, lecture by John Tallon QC of Pump Court Tax Chambers)

About Monthly Tax Review (MTR)

MTR is a 90 minute monthly training course, held in London, Ipswich and Norwich – as well as a reference work.  Each Issue records the most significant tax developments over a wide range of subjects (see below) during the previous month, containing 30 to 40 items.  The aim is not necessarily to take the place of the journals, but rather to provide an easily digestible summary of them and, through the six-monthly Indexes, to build up, over the years, a useful reference work. 

Who should come to MTR? Does it attract CPD?

MTR is designed not primarily for the person who spends 100% of his/her time on tax, but rather for the practitioner (whether private client or company/commercial) for whom tax issues form part of his/her practice.  Attendance at MTR qualifies for 1.5 CPD hours for members of the Law Society, for 1.5 CPD points for accountants (if MTR is considered relevant to the delegate’s practice) and (subject to the individual’s self-certification) should also count towards training requirements for the CIOT.  For STEP purposes, MTR qualifies for CPD in principle, on the grounds that at least 50% of the content is trust and estate related.  
 
How is MTR circulated?

The Notes are emailed to each delegate in the week before the presentations (and thus can easily be circulated around the office), with a follow-up page or two of practical points arising during the various sessions (whether in London, Ipswich or Norwich).

How do I find out more?

For further details, and for those whose firms unable to make the monthly seminars but wishing to order MTR as 'Notes Only' (at £180 per annum for the 12 issues, invoiced six-monthly in advance), visit http://www.taxationweb.co.uk/taxevents/monthly_tax_review.php

Matthew Hutton Conferences 2007

Matthew’s six round the country Estate Planning Conferences in September and October 2007 will be held on the following dates and at the following venues:

East - Thursday 6 September: Cambridge Belfry Hotel, Cambourne CB3 6BW           

North - Wednesday 19 September: Tankersley Manor, South Yorkshire S75 3DQ          

Midlands - Tuesday 25 September: Woodland Grange, Leamington Spa CV32 6RN            
West - Thursday 4 October: Hilton Bristol Hotel BS32 4JF                   

South - Wednesday 17 October: Norton Manor Hotel, Sutton Scotney, nr Winchester SO21 3NB

London - Wednesday 31 October: New Connaught Rooms, London WC2               

The subject matter has yet to be finalised, although brochures will be available in June.  The cost is £295 plus VAT per delegate or for those who have attended a previous Matthew Hutton Estate Planning Conference £270 plus VAT per delegate.

Enquiries for all these Conferences should be made to Matthew on mhutton@paston.co.uk.

About The Author

Matthew Hutton is a non-practising solicitor (admitted 1979), who has specialised in tax for over 25 years. Having run his own consultancy (latterly through Matthew Hutton Ltd) until 30th September 2000, he now devotes his professional time to writing and lecturing.
Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added