This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
HMRC Has The Right To Look At ‘Confidential’ Tax Advice
21/05/2005, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - VAT & Excise Duties
6606 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

VAT Voice by Andrew Needham

Andrew Needham, Director of VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd, outlines the limitations of professional privilege for non-legal advisers, and how the effects of those limitations can be minimised.It has always been recognised that legal advice was protected by ‘legal privilege’, and for the most part, it was thought that this also extended to confidential advice from other professional advisors. In many ways, this was recognised by HMRC (HMC&E as was) in Notice 700/47 ‘ Confidentiality in VAT Matters’, where it was stated:

“Customs recognise that tax advisers have a duty of confidentiality to their clients. Whilst the duty of confidentiality may sometimes be overridden by legal requirements, Customs will not normally request the tax adviser or the trader to produce a communication relating to confidential opinion or advice”

Engagement and advice letters

Recently, a taxpayer, Burghill Valley Golf Club, was asked by HMRC to produce engagement letters and advice letters from their tax advisers, as it was suspected they had implemented a tax avoidance scheme allowing them to obtain VAT exemption for their membership income. The taxpayer obtained legal advice that said that HMRC did not have the powers to demand production of these documents, and so refused to produce them.

HMRC fined the taxpayer for failure to produce records (para. 7(2), Schedule 11, VAT Act 1994), and so Burghill Valley Golf Club subsequently appealed to the VAT Tribunal (No 18,876).

Suffice to say, the Tribunal found in favour of HMRC. They ruled that under current law, the right of privilege only extends to documents passing between a solicitor and his or her clients. No such privilege attaches to documents from other advisors. They also found that HMRC could demand any documents that they saw fit from a taxpayer through a written notice of production, and failure to do so made the taxpayer liable to a penalty.

Minimising the impact

This decision has effectively extended the powers of HMRC to examine confidential correspondence between a taxpayer and his advisors.

However, there are ways of minimising the impact of this decision if you want to maintain the confidentiality of the advice given. The first point would be to make engagement letters and fee notes vague. Rather than explicitly stating that you will be providing advice on the implementation of a specific piece of tax planning advice, just use a general engagement letter stating that you will be providing general tax advice, and the same goes for fee notes. By doing this, you will not automatically tip off HMRC, albeit that you are obtaining perfectly legal tax advice with a view to legitimately reducing your VAT liability.

Secondly, in respect of advisory letters regarding the structuring of specific transactions (e.g. the sale or purchase of property), rather than stating which structure should be used and highlighting the advantages of doing so, you can provide the alternative treatments with no written advice as to the recommended method. This could take the form of a ‘key facts’ report. Then, at a later meeting, you can work through the options and draw the client’s attention to the preferred method so that there is no written advice specifying one method over another, and drawing the attention of HMRC to that area.

It is also helpful to avoid contingency fees that are based on a percentage of savings, as these will automatically draw the attention of HMRC to the existence of a tax planning arrangement. This would avoid the argument put forward in direct tax cases that it is a ‘scheme of arrangement’ whereby both parties to the advice obtain a financial advantage from its success.

Andrew Needham
Director, VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd
Email: andrewneedham@vatsolutions-uk.com

VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd
11 Winmarleigh Street,
Warrington,
WA1 1NB

(T) 01925 242497
(F) 01925 242498
(M) 07810 433927
(W) www.vatsolutions-uk.com

VAT Solutions (UK) Limited is an established independent firm of Chartered Tax Advisers, formed by Andrew Needham and Steve Allen. The company has a cross-section of clients from multi-national companies through to medium-sized and numerous smaller regional firms of accountants and solicitors. They produce a regular publication 'VAT Voice', which can be downloaded directly from the Internet via the following address: www.vatsolutions-uk.com/newsletter.doc

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added